Platinum Sponsor

DocuLynx, Inc

GMC Software International, Inc.

Kodak, Inc.
Platinum Sponsor
Resource Center
Click Here


Gold Sponsor
Elixir Technologies Corporation
Graphic Arts Show Company, Inc.


Silver Sponsor

Crawford Technologies Inc.

Exstream Software by HP

Océ North America, Inc.

Pitney Bowes

Solimar Systems, Inc.

IBM Printing Systems


Partner Sponsor
Media, Ink
Consorzio Pimes
 
 

E-Document News Article
Legal confusion on internet privacy

The clash of data civilisations

Sharply differing attitudes towards privacy in Europe and America are a headache for the world’s internet giants

The Economist - Jun 17th 2010 | SAN FRANCISCO

WATCHDOGS are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. In May European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! demanding independent proof that they were making promised changes to protect the privacy of users’ search history. They also urged Google to store sensitive search data for only six months instead of nine.

In April ten privacy and data-protection commissioners from countries including Canada, Germany and Britain wrote a public letter to Eric Schmidt, Google’s boss, demanding changes in Google Buzz, the firm’s social-networking service, which had been criticised for dipping into users’ Gmail accounts to find “followers” for them without clearly explaining what it was doing. Google promptly complied.

Such run-ins with regulators are likely to multiply—and limit the freedom of global internet firms. It is not just that online privacy has become a controversial issue. More importantly, privacy rules are national, but data flows lightly and instantly across borders, often thanks to companies like Google and Facebook, which manage vast databases.

A recent scandal dubbed “Wi-Figate” exemplifies the problem. Google (accidentally, it insists) gathered data from unsecured Wi-Fi networks in people’s homes as part of a project to capture images of streets around the world. A number of regulators launched investigations. Yet their reaction varied widely, even within the European Union, where member states have supposedly aligned their stance on online privacy. Some European watchdogs ordered Google to preserve the data it had collected in their bailiwicks; others demanded that information related to their countries be destroyed

More... http://www.economist.com/world/international/displaystory.cfm?story_id=16377097

 


Search E-DocumentNews:
  • What’s a Metric? Where do I buy one? Is it a package? - Pat McGrew, EDP
  • The Mother of All Inventions - the Xerox 914
  • Océ Receives GEICO Partnership Excellence Award
  • To Reduce Waste, Smug Customers Use RFID Coffee Mugs - By Claire Swedberg
  • TNT Wins New Security Business Thanks to GMC Software Technology
  • First 100 companies registered on ITOlist.eu – catalogue of IT outsourcing service providers from Central and Eastern Europe
  • With Office 2010, Microsoft Braces for Battle - by Rich Jaroslovsky
  • Bits & Bytes - the Newsletter within a Newsletter
  • Loose clicks sink ships -The Economist Technology Quarterly - June 12, 2010
  • Legal confusion on internet privacy
  • | Xplor Home || XDU Home || Privacy Policy || Terms of Use | © Copyright 2010 Xplor International